Available for new projects — Q1
For teams who need a product shipped properly, an integration that stops breaking, or a codebase someone else abandoned.
“Every new feature takes three times longer than it should.”
“Our systems don't talk to each other, so someone re-keys data daily.”
“The developer who built it is gone and nobody understands the code.”
“It works, but we can't deploy without holding our breath.”
PLACEHOLDER — founder name and photograph. The person who scopes your project writes or reviews the code.
Our engagement models and pricing method are on the site, before you ask.
From an engineer, with a real technical observation — not a form letter.
Code, repositories and infrastructure accounts are yours from day one. Handover terms are stated up front.
We deliberately do not do machine-learning research, native game development, or staff augmentation at scale. (PLACEHOLDER — confirm the real exclusion list.)
From a defined problem to a system in production — designed, built and handed over properly, by the people who will maintain it.
Make your systems agree with each other, so data moves once, correctly, and nobody re-keys it into a second tool at six in the evening.
Software that removes work instead of adding another system to manage, starting with whichever manual process is costing you the most hours.
Someone else built it and they are gone. We make it safe to change again, and then we stay to maintain it.
Everything on this site is one content layer, so it can be queried rather than browsed. Type services, or open payment-reconciliation, and the diagram redraws from the engagement you opened. Press ⌘K from anywhere on the page.
solutionmines // index
> status
services 4
engagements 3
reply < 1 business day, from an engineer
ownership yours — code, repos, accounts, day one
COMMANDS
help list these commands
services what we do
work engagements we can show
open <slug> inspect either, in full
stack every technology in use, by count
process the five stages and their artefacts
contact how to start
clear reset this log
| Slug | Service | Engagement |
|---|---|---|
| product-engineering | Product Engineering | PLACEHOLDER — typically 6 to 16 weeks · project |
| integrations | API & Systems Integration | PLACEHOLDER — typically 4 to 8 weeks · project |
| automation-data | Automation & Data Workflows | PLACEHOLDER — typically 3 to 8 weeks · project |
| modernization | Modernization & Ongoing Care | PLACEHOLDER — assessment typically 1 to 2 weeks · retainer |
| Slug | Engagement | Client |
|---|---|---|
| payment-reconciliation | Reconciling three payment sources into one ledger | Logistics company |
| codebase-rescue | Taking over an abandoned codebase for a B2B SaaS team | B2B SaaS company |
| sync-teardown | Why we stopped trusting third-party sandbox environments | Engineering note |
Stage names are easy to write. Artifacts are not. Each stage below names the thing you actually receive — which is what makes a process claim checkable.
Most of what we build belongs to the people who paid for it. Below is what we can show: engagements published with permission, systems we built for ourselves, and work we have released openly.
Simplified architectureIdentifying detail removed
Three payment sources, three spreadsheets and a six-hour weekly reconciliation, replaced by a scheduled job that only asks for a human on exceptions.
We will tell you what we would do about it — before you have paid us anything.
Five minutes. What you are building, or what is broken.
From an engineer, with a real question or observation.
Free, no deck, no obligation.